data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f26ac/f26acb496b99b24e377882c2e938ae4c35950bbe" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1349a/1349a48c2f7745ca719b942a58313787bd127cef" alt=""
The Rick Random volume is one that I've seen some proofs for and I think everyone will be happier with the quality of the artwork from the viewpoint of it being cleaned up. It's one of the major problems with reprinting old strips—the source material is often very poor and just getting it back to how it was printed can be the devil's own job. Having recently spent a ridiculous amount of time doing just that, I can promise you that the effort is being put in, even if the results aren't perfect. The pages I was working on date back to just after the war (1945-47) and they were atrocious. With the paper shortage still ongoing (which it would be until the early 1950s), comics publishers had to print on what they could get hold of even if it was newsprint that had obviously been recycled quite a few times. Imperfections in the paper meant that the final printed results were pretty imperfect themselves. Add to the problem thin paper which allowed the reverse page to show through, zipotone that flaked off and left speckles all over the page and a dozen other ways that even original artwork can be imperfect (badly patched on panels, old nibs that leave a ghostly echo of a line trailing behind it, blobs of ink filling in letters, etc., etc.) and anyone attempting to clean up a page can be faced with some ghastly-looking results even once you've removed that horrible yellow cast that afflicts old comics and painted out the rust stains from decomposing staples.
We were very lucky with the recent Frank Bellamy's Robin Hood book as that was printed photogravure on better paper. We've had some very nice compliments about the quality of the reproduction from people who know the original source material. Other books taken from letterpress comics printed on newsprint aren't going to be up to that standard unless someone were to take an awful lot of time restoring the artwork... and if they did that you wouldn't be picking up copies in shops for under £15 (or on Amazon for £6.99).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b7eb/2b7ebd9c4689a3ecdd0bf748b2447c5bb66d392a" alt=""
There will be some more Don Lawrence news coming soon as I believe there will shortly be a sale of Trigan Empire artwork. I'll post more once I know the details. I do know that it will involve originals from just about every artist who worked on Trigan Empire, including original boards from both Don Lawrence and Ron Embleton.
The rest of the news...
* It's that Dan Dare sales figures time of the month again. ICv2 have published figures for sales of comics pre-ordered through Diamond Distributors for March 2008. The figures for issue 5 are 7,518, down 4.6% from the February (#4) figure of 7,885. That's relatively steady as the January figure was 7,657. (heads up via Journalista) Gary Erskine, the artist, is a guest at the Singapore Toy & Comic Convention for 2008 and Forbidden Planet International have posted an image of the 2 1/2 metre tall poster that advertises the event.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ae8/b6ae807a245141b5869a4ec40870f105e5b5034f" alt=""
Update: The Times (26 April) carries a review of the exhibition by Nigel Kendall.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/173c9/173c9346a9ce77dcdb0ee0e61f315f5191da3ca5" alt=""
* Lew Stringer has been posting some interesting bits on his blog. The most recent posts have been about the barely-known Welsh language comic Sboncyn and a look at a 1965 issue of Bimbo, complete with cover strip drawn by Dudley D. Watkins.
(* Rick Random and Trigan Empire © IPC Media; Dan Dare © Dan Dare Corporation; Roy of the Rovers © Egmont UK Ltd.; Lucy Porter is... not sure but her website says © 2008.)
No comments:
Post a Comment